Nana Patekar
is no more, screamed the headlines. No, no, he is very much with us. In the
hearts of millions who value spontaneity, originality and versatility. He was
no actor playing a role. He was a real character on celluloid. These men do not
perish. They stay with us forever. Nana was to Indian films what Budhi Kunderan
was to Indian cricket. Both have remained my eternal favourites.
Let the Kunderan story begin…
Against West
Indies in 1967 at Eden Gardens, Kunderan mis-hooked a Wes Hall bouncer,
top-edging the skier to the 3rd man region! Skipper Gary Sobers from
2nd slip ran sideways about 60 yards near the boundary rope and got
his hands to the ball, only to drop it.
Only
Sobers could have tried it. None else. It was not a catch by any means. The
ball was in no-man’s land. But the issue here is that the batter Budhi patted
his raised bat to applaud Sobers’ effort. Amazing indeed. This approach set him
apart. To Kunderan, there was little difference between Test and picnic
cricket. He loved to be both a participant and an audience.
We all want
to go back to our school days. No cares, no responsibilities. None to impress.
Simple pleasures of life. Budhi retained that innocence till his last days. He
never really wanted to grow up. He never did. He had the spirit to continue
with the carefree approach of a child. He achieved what we all wished to do and
were not able to do so.
Unknowingly,
Budhi Kunderan became an entertainer first and foremost. He had little care for
any win-loss result. He was a showman, a stage artiste. A man born to give
delight to the onlookers. Whichever profession he would have chosen, he would
have been basically an entertainer.
In a sport known for its traditions and
customs, Budhi Kunderan appeared to be a man who had lost his way. He was the
first to change the contours of apparel for cricketers. Cricketers of his time
in the 1960s were so used to flannels, gaberdine and cotswol outfits that we
could not fathom any need for any change of textile. But Budhi, the heretic,
thought otherwise.
In a Test
match he actually batted wearing a collared tee-shirt! It was the Fred
Perrie-designed cotton tee, highly popular in the 1950s and 1960s, particularly
among the tennis fraternity.
Unusual
happenings and Budhisagar Krishnappa Kunderan were rarely away from each other.
He played for his country even before playing first-class cricket! Only a
handful has done so. It was said that so impressed was Lala Amarnath, then a
national selector, by Kunderan’s daredevil antics in inter-railway matches that
he decided Budhi was ready to play Tests! If Lalaji had decided, no one would
have dared to raise his voice in Indian cricket at the time in the 1950s.
For sheer
versatility he has had few equals. He played for India as a specialist
wicket-keeper. He played for India as a specialist middle-order batsman. He
played for India as a specialist opening-batsman. As if these were not unusual
enough, Kunderan even opened the bowling for India in a Test match in England
where the pitches are, as we all know, highly conducive to pace bowlers. So we
may well presume that Kunderan was selected for that particular Test match to
do the specialist’s job of pace bowling as well! He was an outstanding fielder
as well in the deep: agile, acrobatic, swift.
But even these
unusual happenings lose their significance when we have a look at his most
successful series as a Test cricketer. England, then M.C.C., had come under
Mike Smith in the winter of 1963-64. The first Test was at Corporation Stadium,
Madras. Prior to the start of the opening day’s play, the players were warming
up and Budhi Kunderan, one of the reserves, was helping out at one of the nets.
About twenty minutes
before the toss, the first-choice wicket-keeper, Farokh Engineer, was writhing
in pain having suffered a nasty injury to his finger while at practice. The
selectors had no option but to ask Kunderan to be ready to play. Within minutes
not only was Budhi playing, he was actually putting on his pads to open the
innings for India!
Those days
cricketers played in flannel shirts and in full sleeves. But Budhi had no time
for orthodox mode or manner. He strutted out in a white, half-sleeved, tight-fitting
shirt and tight drain-pipes! It was considered a sacrilege to wear such an
outfit even in first-class matches at the time. But Budhi was no respecter of
persons or things; or of customs and conventions.
Next to no time
he was Dennis the Menace in person. He stepped out of his crease to hook David
Larter’s bumpers to the long-leg fence! Went down on his knees and slashed
Barry Knight over cover-point. Began sweeping away-going spin and, to add
sauce, drew away to the leg side to cut square off the top of the bails. It was
sheer bravado, if not outright madness. No normal player would dare to even
contemplate such a display of complete disdain.
Budhi Kunderan
went berserk as did the crowd. Cricket connoisseurs shook their heads in disbelief,
but the spectators loved every moment. Whatever it was, it was certainly not
the cricket as we knew it. It was pure mayhem. Was his attitude not the
precursor to the T20 approach to batting?
England’s
much-vaunted professionalism, ‘scientific’ field-placing, ultra-defensive
tactics went through the window in next to no time. Budhi the heretic had no
time for heritage. The hurricane called Kunderan was in no mood for security or
style, convention or custom. He was at a race. A race to highlight gay abandon.
A race against
orthodoxy; a race against grumpy faces; a race against theorists. When the
hurricane finally subsided, Kunderan had raced to 192. It was an innings of sheer
dare-devilry, sheer audacity. For sheer belligerence that innings has rarely
been bettered.
By then Kunderan
had earned crowd support. They had received their money’s worth. To a man they
admired his guts, his sense of adventure. Medium of height, slight of build he
was an unlikely hero. But the handsome chiseled features of the
ebony-complexioned man made people sit up to take notice. He had taken
convention by its throat and put it to rest in a most audacious manner.
After that
attacking near double-century Budhi became a certainty for the rest of the
series. He opened the batting in his own unconventional way but was extremely
consistent, ending the series with yet another century. He was the highest
run-getter as well as the leader in the batting averages. Not that he cared.
Nor did he ever bother to remember, not even after retirement.
He was a
desperado in the best sense of the term. Being of the attacking mould, he
played with fire and took grave risks, often leading to suicidal dismissals.
Security and orthodoxy were alien concepts to this man. He loved challenges. He
embraced risks. He was a fighter pilot in the garb of an Indian Railway cricketer.
It was this
defiant attitude, this aversion towards convention, this allergy to dull
monotony that endeared him to the cricket lovers. His exciting personality
permeated that excitement among the onlookers. When Kunderan walked out to bat,
we did not expect match-winning innings. Nor did we hope for match-saving
graces. We wanted action; we wanted adventure to lead us to thrills we did not
get in everyday life. And in this Budhi hardly ever failed to disappoint us. Surely
his approach to cricket inspired people to think in terms of T20 matches.
He was primarily
an entertainer from top to toe. Everything about him was unusual. He would not
wear loose cricket trousers, but ‘drain-pipes’! He would open for India with
the approach as if he was the no. 11 in the batting order! He would walk as if
he was on a modelling ramp. This is not to be construed a criticism, but a
compliment to his fun-loving, exciting persona, whom we adored.
In looks he
resembled the handsome Rohan Kanhai. In batting too his approach – not the
skill: none can match Kanhai’s creativity – matched the world numero uno of the
1960s. If Kanhai was the epitome of individualism in a highly individualistic
West Indies side, so was Budhi Kunderan in the India team. In Calcutta we the
Bongs adored him for his individualistic streak. But Budhi’s inconsistency of
performance went against him in selectorial eyes.
Once at
Edgbaston in 1967 he opened India’s bowling attack. When asked by the umpire
what he would bowl, Kunderan replied that he would have to bowl one delivery to
find out! And then, promptly bowled a bumper to Geoff Boycott, who was so taken
aback that he had to duck to avoid it. Yes, that was typical Kunderan, the
non-conformist.
He happens to be
one of the few batters who have been called back by the opposing captain after
being given out. This happened in the Mumbai Test against West Indies in 1967
when Lance Gibbs appealed successfully against him for a catch at short leg by
Gary Sobers.
But Sir Gary,
the sportsman that he was, withdrew the appeal and Budhi stayed back. Budhi
took the opportunity to score a brilliant 79 against the deadly combination of
Hall and Griffith; Sobers and Gibbs. This can only happen to cricketers who are
genuinely loved by their opponents. Yes, Budhi was surely one of these rare
birds.
Kunderan’s
greatest fans would agree that his keeping of wickets was too flashy to be
consistent. He had a tendency to grab, a weakness he never even tried to
remedy. If he tried, then he would not have been Budhi. We liked Budhi because
he was so unpredictable, so unusual and so individualistic. He was an innocent
child in the garb of an adult. We just loved his innocence, his child-like nature.
While
discussing unusual incidents on the cricket field, former Test umpire Samar Roy
once mentioned to me, “Jaisimha and Kunderan used to chat while taking runs!
Against Mike Smith’s MCC at Eden, I remember Budhi, while taking a run, say
‘One, Jai’ and Jai replied ‘Right ho, Buddy’. Mind you, Raju, all this was
happening while taking a single in a Test match!”
Only
extraordinary artistes could do so with such spontaneity and casual manner.
What showmanship! They were real entertainers with not a care of the morrow.
I met him
just once. In 1992 in Scotland. I was the coach of Kailash Gattani’s Star
Cricket Club. During the course of a match at Aberdeen I was walking around the
ground where hardly 10 people had gathered to watch. Suddenly I noticed an
Indian face which looked very familiar. Walked up and asked, “Excuse me, are
you not Mr Budhi Kunderan?” The face smiled and nodded. Took me to a
boundary-adjacent canopy for coffee and we conversed and conversed.
When I told
him about his own cricket exploits, his eyes became moist. He was frozen in
time. I mentioned all his unique, non-conventional traits and mannerisms. He
was happy, extremely happy. I realized that he was missing his homeland having
married a British lady and having settled down in UK. He had come to watch his
son play that particular match for the Scottish team.
He expressed
no regrets, no recriminations. Did not criticize, nor did he condemn. He kept
all his frustrations to himself. Whenever I tried to raise a few unsavoury issues,
he said, “Well, that’s life. You win some. You lose some.” When I tried to pay
for the coffee, he took out his wallet and said, “Please let me remain an
Indian. You are in my hometown.”
My last
parting shot actually staggered him. Told him, “In 1964 you snicked John Price
and began to walk before wicket-keeper Binks could even appeal. Then you flung
your bat high in the air and as the bat descended you caught the bat one-handed
and strode away to the pavilion. Never seen such magnificent showmanship on a
cricket field. You should have been on stage or ramp.” Hindustan
Standard had published the picture on the first page.
He ruminated
for a while, “Were you actually there? You saw that happen? You still remember it
so well. I had forgotten the incident. Never quite thought about it. Certainly had
not rehearsed it. It was a spontaneous gesture.” Absolutely to the point, he
was. Budhi Kunderan was a spontaneous showman who used the cricket field as his
stage.
Kunderan
actually was born 50 years too early. He would have thoroughly enjoyed the
slap-bang variety of T20 cricket of today. He would have given tons of thrills
and loads of enjoyment to the spectators.
The modern media
with its penchant to highly emphasize characters would have found in him an
ideal target. He would have made an ideal model for merchandise with his looks,
mannerism and personality.
One
particular incident at Eden Gardens I still shudder to relate. Standing on his
left toe, Kunderan hooked David Larter and in one reflex action swung his right
leg over the stumps! Yes, his heels were just about 2 inches above the bails! I
do not think anyone before or since has done such a fascinating act. It was ala
Kanhai’s falling sweep. Irresponsible, we thought. But to the irrepressible man
it was spontaneous, instinctive A born entertainer, if ever there was one.
Budhi Kunderan
was all youth, all adventure, a total non-conformist, a total misfit in Test
cricket. But we loved him nevertheless. Akin to his close buddies Durani and Jaisimha,
Budhi Kunderan revived the seed of glamour in post-war Indian cricket.
As I got up
from my seat and extended my hand, the soulful face uttered, “In life nothing
actually adds up. Nothing remains at the end.” I was stunned. The sensitivity
of Shyamal Mitra’s tune rang in my ears: Jibon
khatar proti patay jotoi lekho hishab
nikash, kichhui robe na…(In life no matter whatever calculations you make,
nothing will remain…).
Budhi
Kunderan was the ultimate sannyasi: totally carefree without a single complaint
against anybody for all the trials and tribulations he had to face. Is this
Budhi, the innocent child? Or, Kunderan, the philosopher in disguise?
He did not
extend his hand to clasp mine. He got up and hugged me! Two totally different
personalities, who knew not each other were locked in an embrace high up in the
Scottish Highlands! Now it was my turn to shed tears…
Different
paths lead to the same goal: thanks to Bhagwan Shri Ramakrishna.


No comments:
Post a Comment