Sunday, 19 April 2026

 



Man with a mission

One singular man with a singular act transformed the thought-process of Indian cricket forever. He conceived the concept of talent-spotting by going deep into the interiors of this wide and wonderful land of ours. No one earlier had thought of this idea. People in cities waited for talents to come to them. Makarand Waingankar thought otherwise. Who had time for village and small-town talents earlier?

Who’s this fella giving gyaan to Indian cricket administrators? The corporate marketing job took the bright gentleman to the districts and beyond. His liberal, social-minded soul hit upon the novel idea and the freelance journalist in him put forward his view to BCCI and KSCA.

Thankfully both Brijesh Patel of KSCA and Prof Ratnakar Shetty – the man who cleaned the cobwebs at BCCI and made it a happening place – were quick to grasp the excellent proposal. Shetty brought some very sincere Talent Resource Development Officers (TRDOs) under the BCCI fold and sent them on the discovery trail.  Almost overnight players from non-fancied areas began to be identified and rewarded. Men like MS Dhoni, Suresh Raina and Irfan Pathan are prime examples.

Mack in time acted as a mentor to players who faced serious problems. The youthful Yuvraj Singh was a beneficiary. Even non-Test players benefitted from his acquaintance in their respective careers. Young players like Gautam Som and Subhasis Das, both from Bengal, come readily to mind.

Mack has no remarkable cricket background as an active player. Does not belong to any influential media-house.  Has no powerful administrator beside him. But he has a mind of his own.

Has the courage of conviction. An appetite for knowledge and the spirit of innovation. The independent mind of a bright soul: a warrior true to his mission.

 

I first met him in the press enclosure at Feroz Shah Kotla in the mid-1980s. It was a peculiar kind of rapport at first sight. He had not seen me play (thank God), but had read my articles in Tiger Pataudi-edited Sportsworld.

Unsmiling, the firm voice asked, ”Can we please use your articles for our Marathi cricket fortnightly?”  Even I, a poor judge of people, could see the sincerity and the integrity in that tall, confident frame of his. Taking permission from ABP, I gave consent. This was one judgement, I am proud to say I did right!

Waingankar and Pappu Sanzgiri became involved with Sandip Patil’s cricket fortnightly Ekach Shatkar. The magazine put to shade even established English sports magazines in Marathi-speaking regions. Since then Mack has gone from peak to peak in his own individual style and route.

Mack has cricket printed on his heart. Initially in Marathi journalism he brought about a silent revolution which rose to a crescendo that reverberated around the country. His writings and books in English have added dimensions to the history of the game in the country. While on a short sabbatical, he finished his Ph.D in cricket.

Today as I sit and write this blog I realize that I am 76 and still need someone to push me out of my lethargy. Mack did that job with ease. “You have rested throughout 2024 and 2025. Now do start again for the sake of only those who genuinely love cricket.” I thought he was right. Thanks, Mack.

 

Saturday, 18 April 2026

 

 



Stoddart: why? why? why?

The unusual story of Andrew Stoddart yearns to be told and retold to show the futility of life. He belonged to the British aristocracy during the heydays of Victorian Britain. Public school background followed by the usual Oxbridge routine.

A contemporary of Ranjitsinhji, in between his birth in 1863 and his death in 1915, he had achieved enough to satisfy any person’s ego for a lifetime and more. He captained England at cricket. Not content, he tried his hand at rugby and went on to represent England, again as captain.

To be a double international in sport is a highly praiseworthy achievement and only a few outstanding sportspeople have done so. But to lead one’s nation in two sports disciplines is a very, very rare occurrence. Not even the legendary CB Fry could lay claims to have led England both in two sports disciplines.

Stoddart played cricket quite casually. Appearing in patches for Middlesex as a middle-order batter, he could be relied upon to play the responsible innings in times of need. He ended his 16-Test career with an above par average of 37.

Discerning readers would understand the gravity of the statistical figure when they consider that he played on ‘uncovered’ pitches favourable to bowlers. Grace averaged 32 and Ranji 44. Of course, stats mean nothing unless properly perceived. The concept of preparing batter-friendly paradises came much later.

All these unique achievements pale into insignificance when we realize that Andrew Stoddart was the first captain in the history of cricket to have won a match after following-on.

He took the England (then MCC) team to distant Australia, sailing months on seas. In the first Test at Sydney, Australia piled on 586 runs. England’s reply did not go beyond 325. With such a huge lead the Australia asked England to bat again. With defeat staring at them, England reached a decent score of 437 in the 2nd innings. With just 176 to win Australia began its 2nd innings.

Overnight rain affected the fifth and final day’s play. The teams agreed to add an extra day for the benefit of the paying spectators. On the 6th day Stoddart’s team shot the opponents out for 140, thereby winning the match by the narrow margin of just 10 runs. Andrew Stoddart became the first-ever captain to win a match after following-on! This was incredible.

 For nearly 90 years the unique record remained till Mike Brearley’s England upset Australia’s apple-cart in a similar fashion at Leeds in 1981. Brearley making a comeback as captain had the pleasure to see Bob Willis take 8 for43 as Australia collapsed for 111. Botham’s contributed 50 and 149 and took 6 and 1 wickets.

Similarly Sourav Ganguly’s Indians had the measure of Steve Waugh’s Aussies at Eden in 2001. While saluting the magnificent contributions at Eden in 2001 of the magical trio of Laxman (281), Dravid (180) and Harbhajan (7 & 6 wickets), let us not forget that Stoddart’s men were the first to achieve the epic feat way back in 1894.

 Andrew Edward Stoddart’s modesty came to the fore as he maintained that his captaincy had little to do with the ultimate unique result! Grace and graciousness combined.

But what followed was very, very strange. One day at the prime of his life Stoddart decided that enough was enough. He put a pistol to his ear and pulled the trigger. People were shocked. They moaned and sobbed. None knew the reason. No amount of research has been able to unravel the secret.

England captain at cricket and rugby; historic achievement as cricket captain; highly acclaimed all over yet Stoddart yearned to see for himself what lay beyond death…

 

Sunday, 12 April 2026

 



Test cricketer who went missing forever!

One of India’s double-international in sports was Cota Ramaswami from Chennai. Prosperous, articulate, confident, Cota Ramaswami was an amateur sportsman in the most authentic sense of the term. For him sport was certainly not the first priority.

 

Educated at Cambridge University, on his return accepted a highly responsible post in the Madras Agricultural Services. In the midst of his various activities Ramaswamy found the time to lay bare his outstanding sporting qualities.

 

At Cambridge University he was denied a chance even to appear in the cricket trials!

Promptly the Telegu-speaking Cota switched allegiance to tennis and volleyed his way to a Cambridge ‘Tennis-Blue' in the early 1920s. A decade later he was representing India in Davis Cup encounters.

 

Cota Ramaswami was a gifted timer of the ball. In his youth, the graceful left hander would use all his propensities for stroke-play with gay abandon. A delightful mix of academics and sports, his was a commanding figure for the big occasion.

 

When selected to play for Madras Presidency in 1935-36 against Ryder's Australians, Ramaswami was nearly 40, and well past his prime. But the gifts of timing and application were still very much in evidence. He scored 48 not out and 82 with utmost ease and utter disdain.

 

Then within months the India team for the tour of England was announced. Finding his name in the team, Ramaswami was said to have remarked that he “was chosen for reasons other than cricket”!

 

Actually he was being far too modest and unnecessarily self-critical. Probably he said so because he knew that his salad days were behind him and that his physical condition did not measure up to his own high ideals.

 

The 40-plus man made his debut at Old Trafford with 40 and 60. Followed with 29 and unbeaten 41 at Oval. Thus with an average of 56.66 his debut and swansong series coincided. Rejected by Cambridge University cricket team, the sophisticated old man quietly showed England Test team his actual worth as a batter.

 

Ramaswami was the most respected personality in the Indian team on that dreadful tour of England in 1936. His impeccable bearing, his academic credentials, his manner of speech and conduct earned the admiration of his team mates. He was the man who was the perpetual mediator between the warring groups.

 

When the impetuous youngster Lala Amarnath was being sent back from UK in 1936 on disciplinary grounds by captain Vizzy and manager Brittain-Jones, it was the sensible Cota Ramaswamy who pleaded with the administration to keep the talented Lala Amarnath back with a caution. That matured view was not kept, but frowned upon.

 

 One fine morning in 1990 at Chennai the 94-year old Cota Ramaswamy – double international in tennis and cricket – tottered out of his house and drifted away into the unknown…his body was never found!

 

Sunday, 5 April 2026

 


Sports bio-pics in India

Indian biographical films of sportspeople are remarkable for deviating into fiction. Hardly ever we find a film that reveals the truth, especially about the incidents and the people who helped the latter-day heroes in their formative years.
To motivate young talents these bio-pics ought to seek and show the truth behind the great success stories. Why not reveal the names of people who worked behind the scenes when the young talents really needed encouragement and exposure? Why not interview at least some of the actual early coaches, the talent-spotters and the mentors?
Instead most of these films are full of misinformation. Unnecessary details and scenes are created in an effort to attract audiences and perhaps to satisfy influential egos. Is this supposed to be artistic licence where you can project an essential theme entirely oblivious of facts? I honestly wonder.
If one is handling fiction, that’s fine. But if one claims that one is revealing facts, one should at least stick to genuine truth. Shall give my discerning readers a few examples.
In an otherwise wonderful bio-pic depicting the life of India’s famous football coach Syed Abdul Rahim, the main actor’s role has been performed by a tall, strong, handsome man. In real life Rahim-sahab’s physique was puny-thin and his height very short.
Actor Ajay Devgn’s performance was outstanding but the problem is that the figure of the real Rahim was absolutely the opposite to the physique of the reel Rahim! Surely Rahim-sahab would be the first to admit that he never was a good-looking, strongly-built, tall person. The credibility of the bio-pic is in question.
“This is somewhat like Amitabh Bachchan playing the role of Lal Bahadur Shastri,” very convincingly asserted Subroto Rana Sirkar, the prominent former sports journalist and ‘strictly unofficial’ sports historian. Abslolutely to the point. Amitabh Bachchan would surely do a very good job of the role of Shastriji but if the physical forms of the individuals vary to such an extent then a wrong message would be conveyed to the cine-goers.
In another bio-pic on Milkha Singh it is specifically shown that Milkha Singh is taking a sidelong glance in the famous Rome Olympic 400 m race! In a sprint no one – not even in a school race – would look sideways at his opponents. Can you imagine an athlete in the Olympic Games glancing at his opponent during the course of a sprint? It is these fallacies that make these bio-pics look silly.
In a bio-pic on Sachin Tendulkar we are shown that at the net practice coins are placed on the stumps while young Tendulkar is batting. The coach’s idea was to encourage the bowlers to hit the stumps and win that coin as a prize. This concept is excellent, no doubt.
But this issue has been copied from Ranjitsinhji’s early cricketing life in England. Why not give credit to the original man? The Nawanagar prince while in England would privately practice against the best of English professional bowlers at the nets. In addition to their professional fees, he would keep a guinea on each stump to entice the bowlers to bowl him out and claim the coin as his prize!
Why do our bio-pic film-makers not involve the actual people who were behind these success stories? Why not mention and highlight the real people who may not be influential enough or well-known? Why harp on half-truths? Why not do a little more SINCERE research? Why not question the answers of the celebrities? Why force down trash on innocent audiences? Why not be truthful?
Wish our film-makers have a good look at ‘Crown’, a film on the British royalty over the years with ‘warts and all’.
Photo credit: Facebook

Wednesday, 1 April 2026

 

 

Photo: courtesy Wikipedia (Moti Nandi) & You Tube (Sukumar Ray)

Thursday Blog on RAJUMUKHERJIONCRICKET.BLOGSPOT.COM

Cricket & Literature

Shakespeare and Tagore never wrote on cricket. Surely they had other important subjects in mind. But that did not stop many other great literary figures of English and Bengali literature to contribute their views on this great cultural heritage of Britain.

We have discussed the associations and contributions to cricket of Conan Doyle, PG Wodehouse, HG Wells and Nobel laureate Samuel Beckett in this series. Recently JU (English) alumna Soma Mukherjee has further related that eminent authors of the distinction of Wordsworth, Tennyson, Shelly, Keats, Byron and George Orwell among others have also rendered superlative contributions to the British national pastime.

These world famous writers have raised cricket literature far beyond the writings on any other sport in the world. Both in terms of quality and diversity. The richness of cricket literature has generated a very high level of prose and poetry because of the august presence of these illustrious authors.

Cricket literature has a unique dimension of its own in the pantheon of the game. It is not restricted to international cricket scenario at all. More so is the coverage of village-green cricket, local school matches, college and university cricket. Even club and road-side cricket.

In India hardly any established novelist wrote on the game. Dom Moraes did make an effort with The Grass is Green but did not pursue. Eminent author RK Narayan too wrote a wonderful piece MCC on young, village boys trying to form a cricket club.

Fortunately in Bengal, eminent researcher Shankari Prasad Bosu left behind some splendid authorship on cricket before delving into his magnum opus on Swami Vivekananda. He delighted in relating the cricket stories of old, among which ‘Ball porey, bat norey’ (Ball drops, bat moves) was the most popular.

My wife Seema brought into my focus a most unusual illustration: sketch of a lady-in-saree square-cutting a pumpkin! My all-time favourite author of nonsense-verse, the famous writer Sukumar Ray – Satyajit Ray’s exceptionally brilliant father – drew an inimitable illustration to go with the absurdly, immortal line: kumro niye cricket khele keno rajar pishi?  (Why is the king’s aunt playing cricket with a pumpkin?)

Every Bengali-speaking person is aware of the genius of Sukumar Ray through the pages of ABOL TABOL. The quote appears in the widely acclaimed nonsense-verse ‘Bombagarer Raja’, which was written between 1921 and 1923.  As a close relative of Prof Saradaranjan Roy, the father of Bengal Cricket, to Sukumar Ray the game of cricket was not a mere sport but an emotional attachment. Was he the first to put cricket in print in Bengali literature?

But the man who brought cricket to the centre-stage of Bengali literature was none other than the eminent novelist / short-story writer Moti Nandy. Moti-da was a master story-teller with turns of phrase that had the connoisseurs yearning for more. His literary efforts traversed all sports, but his first love remained cricket. My mentor in more ways than one. Much more on him later.

Saturday, 28 March 2026

           




Tenzing Norgay

 

Darjeeling, 1955. Dr ‘Pahari’ Guha Mazumdar was at the time the civil surgeon of the Darjeeling district. A selfless man of charm and honour. The hill people were his family. He spoke their language, he wore their ‘sarong’, he ate their food and he took care of them. The Sherpas and the other hill tribes literally worshipped him.

 

Among the hardy Sherpas who came to visit the ‘Pahari daktar saab’ was a man who began life as a guide and coolie to foreign mountaineers who came to the foothills of the Himalayas with the intention to climb the various high peaks of the region. Within a few years he was not only the best guide available but also the most sought-after supervisor of the labourers, who carried heavy loads on their back to help the expedition teams.

 

Away from mountaineering expeditions this stocky, tough Sherpa was a social worker par excellence in his hometown bustee at Darjeeling. He would carry the old and the infirm to the good doctor and flash his heart-winning smile. He became Dr Guha Mazumdar’s younger brother in every respect imaginable.

 

When Sherpa Tenzing came down from the skies in 1953, the noble doctor complimented him on his ‘conquest’ of Mount Everest. The world renowned climber in all modesty replied, “Doctor saab, I was lucky to go on a pilgrimage to God’s abode.”

 

The doctor embraced him and began to weep uncontrollably. Years later Dr Guha Mazumdar told our family, “I realized there and then how small we were. The real people are these men who have the highest regard for the bounties of nature. Our knowledge is so very shallow, so very superfluous. These simple, innocent hill people have a far more profound understanding and respect for nature.”

 

 

In a country where genuine heroes are forgotten, erosion in values is the only option. A true champion of Tenzing Norgay’s stature has receded into the background. The spirit of adventure has ebbed. We have no inclination towards sports of high risks. Our whole ethos revolves around ‘heroes’ of doubtful potential.

 

The greatness of Tenzing lay in his simplicity. International renown and awards chased him. Presidents and kings followed his trail. Press and politicians pestered him. But he remained his smiling self with the barest minimum of needs.

 

The greatness of the man lay in his innocence. He just could not utter a lie, not even a white lie. When asked who stepped first on top of Mt. Everest, Tenzing replied that though they had the same rope around their waist, Edmund Hillary’s feet were the first on the summit and his own followed soon after. It takes great courage to say that.

 

 In mountaineering parlance, two climbers handling the same rope are considered to be together and not separate from each other. In a high-risk adventure sport like mountaineering, the issue of individualism does not arise. It is a total team effort. Tenzing could easily have avoided the issue with a vague answer, but then, Tenzing would not have been Tenzing.

 

This was the real Tenzing. Throughout his life he has been ‘used’ by others. On being appointed the Director of Himalayan Mountaineering Institute, he was assured by Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and Chief Minister of West Bengal Dr Bidhan Chandra Roy that his appointment was for life and that he would accordingly draw remuneration throughout his tenure.

 

But after the death of those political leaders, he was asked to retire! No further remuneration, no pension followed. Moreover, throughout his period of directorship, not once did he get any increment on his salary!

 

When some little money came to him by way of book royalty and donations, numerous blood-relations appeared and came to stay in his humble home and lived off him. The kind-hearted man just could not turn them away. When India began sending expeditions to Mt.Everest, nobody thought him important enough to be invited at the flagging-off ceremonies. But not once did he ever express any grudge against any of his exploiters.

 

Born in Nepal of Sherpa stock, Tenzing lived in the British-built hill-station of Darjeeling in North Bengal. After the epic achievement of ‘summiting Everest’ in 1953 he was offered “nationality” by both Nepal and India. Both countries, which had done nothing for him or for his indomitable Sherpa people, wanted to claim him as one of their own for international publicity.

 

Pressure was piled on him from either side, but Tenzing, true to his honest belief, maintained that he was both a Nepali and an Indian! In his innocence he highlighted the international nature of his personality.

This is exactly the kind of pettiness and disregard we have shown a man who literally put India on top of the world.

 

On 29th May, 1953, he and the New Zealander, Edmund Hillary, reached the summit of Mt.Everest as part of the British expedition team under John Hunt. When the tri-colour flag fluttered on top of the world on that historic day, the brave man holding the pick-axe was none other than this self-made mountaineer from Darjeeling in Bengal.

 

When they realized they were on the summit, two toughest and bravest of men embraced each other and began to shed tears. They were mesmerized by the beauty and the grandeur of nature. Tenzing took out the sweet lozenge and the coloured-pencil-stub his daughter Nima had given him and offered it to the Almighty!

 

People who climb peaks are themselves at the summit of the human race. They have little interest in borders and barriers. Rarefied realms they traverse in isolation. They do not bother about nationality, race, colour of skin, levels of education, financial backgrounds. Edmund Hillary would not have opted for the ‘coloured’, poor Sherpa when he decided on the final launch, if he was a racist.

 

Tenzing did not blink an eye to say that Hillary was the first to step on the summit ahead of him. In mountaineering two climbers together on the same rope are like twins. The rope is the umbilical cord.  They are together, inseparable. They have the same identity. Both Hillary and Tenzing were very appropriately given the honour of being the first to climb the highest peak on earth. None would consider them first and second in order.

 

 If Tenzing was magnanimous, so too was Hillary. On top Hillary reciprocated by clicking Tenzing’s photo on Mt Everest and did not insist on having his own photo taken. These sacrifices are beyond the comprehension of most of us.

 

Why was just Tenzing’s photo on the summit taken? Why not Hillary’s as well? The reason being that they had just two exposures left. Hillary realized that Tenzing may not be able to handle the camera well enough. So to get the perfect frame, he took Tenzing’s picture and with the single remaining frame he clicked the final path they traversed for the benefit of future mountaineers. These acts of Tenzing and Hillary are at the summit of man’s selflessness.

 

Mountaineering is an amazing sport. Exclusively for the bravest and selfless of men and women. There are no spectators to cheer and applaud up on the mountain. No media support for instant glory. It is a complete team-effort. No individual can do it alone without the active, selfless support of his colleagues.

 

One small error and the climber invites his own death; sometimes even dragging down his partner with him. Very lonely, very slow, very difficult the progress is. Courage, strength, patience, team-work, leadership all combine to be successful in this most dangerous of all sports.

 

Mountaineering is man’s communion with nature. Not a sport between humans. It is a pursuit to overcome the almost insurmountable hazards of natural obstacles: climate, rain, blinding sun-light, gusty wind, snow, rocks, crevice, chasm, lack of oxygen, no shade or shadow, glacier, avalanche. Why would anybody want to volunteer to attempt to overcome such odds?

 

The mind of a genuine mountaineer is almost impossible to fathom. They are above the concept of self. These dare-devils care not about fame or fortune. Why would any sane person opt for a sport where there is no return in any form?  Why aim for a deserted summit? There are so many ‘whys?’ begging for answers.

 

To help us understand the reason for a mountaineer to climb a peak, a legendary climber by the name of Keith Mallory simply said, “Because it is there.”  Full stop. All questions vanish in a moment. One is astounded in the face of such selfless courage. Incidentally Mallory vanished in the Himalayas in the 1920s while attempting to climb the world’s highest peak. His body was never found.

 

Tenzing could not write yet he sent hundreds of letters to his fans worldwide. Tenzing could not read, yet he received thousands of articles and books written on him from his admirers all over the world. 

 

Tenzing Norgay’s admirers are legion. His exploits on the mountain are legendary. Generous, courageous, honest, self-less, the exemplary mountaineer remains to this day a legend and an inspiration to millions around the world. But in his own country, for which he earned so much of international respect and adulation, he is a forgotten man.

 

When ‘Pahari’ doctor took our family to meet him, the ever-smiling all-conquering Tenzing Norgay picked up the 5 year old child in his arms and related constantly to my parents, “It was a pilgrimage to the Almighty’s abode.”  I can still feel the blessed touch. He was my first hero. Never regretted the fact. With every passing day I can still smell the earthy odour of the most marvelous of human beings. For me, it was a pilgrimage to the best of creations.

 

 

Thursday, 26 March 2026

 




Above Sir Don!

Sir Donald George Bradman’s batting average in Test cricket stands at 99.94! Many great batters over the decades have tried their best to come near this astronomical figure. But all these legendary players have fallen far short. No prominent batter has come anywhere near to the one and only Sir Don.

It needed a short man however to show us the truth behind the cliché, ‘lies, damned lies and statistics’. The man was from the island of Trinidad. On his home ground at Port of Spain, the capital city of Trinidad, Andrew  Gordon Ganteaume was selected to represent West Indies against MCC (then England) in 1947 in the 2nd Test match of the series.

The deputy wicket-keeper was included at the last moment as the regular opener was unavailable and he played as an opening batsman. While batting, the debutant opener was his usual cautious self. Certainly more so because of the opportunity to play for the Federation of West Indies for the first time.

He was the highest scorer with 112 in the first innings and was not required to bat in the next innings. He was certainly very happy and looked forward to more opportunities. Little did he realize that selectors are men of varying intelligence and have unusual interests. They can be vindictive (SS Mitter’s and Amol Muzumder’s experience); they can be forgetful (Paras Dogra of J&K, a recent example); they can be…

Ganteaume was dropped from the West Indies team for the following Test as well as for the remainder of the series! And forever it seemed…

Ten years later someone suddenly remembered the diminutive, dogged opener. He went to England in 1957 but by then with the fantastic strength of the West Indies batting line-up – Weekes, Walcott, Worrell, Kanhai, Sobers and Collie Smith – no place could be found for him in the XI.

Thus ended the career of a man who played just one Test innings, scored 112 and finished his Test career ahead of Sir Don with a batting average of 112! Ganteaume achieved statistically what the legendary batters of cricket could not: beat Sir Don somehow!

Born in 1921 his first class career stretched from 1940 to 1963. Forlorn and anonymous he remained, except for that one day of glory.

 

Photo credits: Instagram (Sir Donald Bradman) & Facebook (Andy Ganteaume)

Interested readers may go through RAJUMUKHERJIONCRICKET.BLOGSPOT.COM for all earlier blog posts